Why is the Mainstream Media Ignoring
Vaccine Fraud Cases?
PRINTABLE FRAUD FINDINGS for Each Vaccine Manufacturer
|
|
Wall Street Journal: Did Merck Unfairly Monopolize the Market for a Mumps Vaccine?
“The ultimate victims here are the millions of children who, every year, are being injected with a mumps vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection,” the lawsuit filed by the virologists states. And while federal health officials have said the disease was supposed to have been eradicated by now, “the failure of Merck’s vaccine has allowed this disease to linger with significant outbreaks continuing to occur.” Meanwhile, the mumps vaccine was ringing the register at Merck, which reported that sales reached $621 million last year, when including both the MMR II vaccine – which is mumps, measles and rubella – and the ProQuad vaccine, a combination product that is also used to thwart chickenpox, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
“The ultimate victims here are the millions of children who, every year, are being injected with a mumps vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection,” the lawsuit filed by the virologists states. And while federal health officials have said the disease was supposed to have been eradicated by now, “the failure of Merck’s vaccine has allowed this disease to linger with significant outbreaks continuing to occur.” Meanwhile, the mumps vaccine was ringing the register at Merck, which reported that sales reached $621 million last year, when including both the MMR II vaccine – which is mumps, measles and rubella – and the ProQuad vaccine, a combination product that is also used to thwart chickenpox, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al. v. MERCK & CO.
Pennsylvania Eastern District Court, Case No. 2:10-cv-04374-CDJ
District Judge C. DARNELL JONES, II, presiding
Concerned Citizens of California OPPOSE SB277, which mandates a rigid vaccine schedule for ALL children who do not possess a medical exemption.
United States of America vs. Merck (2:10-CV-04374-CDJ) is a current case in which former virologists, now whistleblowers, allege Merck falsified data with regards to the efficacy of the MMRII vaccine.
Pennsylvania Eastern District Court, Case No. 2:10-cv-04374-CDJ
District Judge C. DARNELL JONES, II, presiding
Concerned Citizens of California OPPOSE SB277, which mandates a rigid vaccine schedule for ALL children who do not possess a medical exemption.
United States of America vs. Merck (2:10-CV-04374-CDJ) is a current case in which former virologists, now whistleblowers, allege Merck falsified data with regards to the efficacy of the MMRII vaccine.
